Concrete remains one of the most popular materials in construction and is second only to water in terms of material consumption around the globe. However, drawbacks like the material’s high carbon impact can make it an unattractive option for some projects.
The cement industry is one of the main producers of carbon dioxide, and growing consumer awareness of climate change and the environmental impact of construction have some clients looking for alternatives to materials that rely on cement.
There is a growing range of concrete alternatives. These materials provide similar benefits as concrete, like strength, durability, and longevity, but at a lower carbon cost, with less environmental impact, and often with an appealing and distinctive appearance.
Ferrock is a carbon-negative concrete alternative. The material’s name comes from ferrous rock, but it is primarily composed of waste steel dust and ground silica glass.
The material generates significantly less carbon dioxide than concrete. It’s also very strong — around five times more sturdy than Portland cement. It’s also flexible, meaning it can bend without breaking due to compression or seismic action.
On the construction site, the material sets faster than concrete, making it practical for jobs where speed is necessary. The material can be hard to source due to its novelty, but in areas where it is available, it makes an excellent alternative to concrete.
A similar material, ashcrete, uses waste fly ash from coal burning operations and offers similar benefits as ferrock.
Recycled materials like these are quickly becoming some of the most popular building materials available. If increasing production makes the material easier to source over the next few years, it could become a valuable alternative to concrete.
2. Rammed Earth
Rammed earth is made by compacting dampened subsoil between temporary formwork. The earth, once cured, is strong, durable, and resistant to the elements with the right treatment. It can be further strengthened with the use of construction techniques like rebar and steel frames.
Because the mixture of subsoil needed for rammed earth is readily available on many construction sites, it can sometimes be as easy to source as concrete — or even easier.
Construction crews require only minimal training on the material to build new structures using it. Building a rammed earth structure is a labour-intensive process, however, meaning that labour costs for a building may be higher when rammed earth is used. A crew will also need at least one skilled laborer to lead the construction process.
The material also has a unique visual appearance. It’s multi-colored, and with the layers of soil visible in the final product, it makes a good choice for clients who want a distinctive building facade or interior walls.
Like ferrock, the material’s use isn’t that common, but a number of high-profile construction projects in the past few years, like the rammed earth walls at Bushey Cemetery, have experimented with rammed earth.
The material’s exotic look and environmental benefits make it a good concrete alternative for construction companies, architects and designers with clients interested in unusual and eco-friendly building designs.
3. Straw Bales
Like rammed earth, straw bales are a construction material with a long history. While they aren’t used often in modern construction, they have strength and durability that are comparable to concrete, making them an effective alternative to concrete blockwork in certain situations.
The bales are typically used as insulation or to provide structural support. Straw bales are naturally fire-resistant and have strong insulative properties, though they can be susceptible to rot, making them less practical in especially damp or humid climates.
Compared to concrete, straw bales can take up a significant amount of space compared to other materials and may be less practical to transport — both to and around construction sites. The use of equipment like skid steers when moving the material on construction sites can make the material much more practical, however.
Timbercrete is made from a mixture of waste sawdust and cement. It’s lighter than concrete, and because it reduces the amount of cement necessary for each brick or slab, it’s also less carbon-intensive. Depending on the ratio of sawdust to cement, it can be comparably strong and weather-resistant.
Because the material requires cement, it isn’t completely eco-friendly. However, the use of sawdust as an additive helps cut down on the amount of cement that would otherwise be necessary. It also provides another valuable recycling option for sawdust which is sometimes landfilled and often burnt for fuel, releasing atmospheric carbon that can take new growth as much as a decade to reabsorb.
This material is made from a biocomposite of hemp shives — a waste product generated when processing hemp into fiber — and lime, sand, or various pozzolans.
Like other concrete alternatives, it has a compressive strength and lifespan comparable to concrete. It also generates significantly less carbon than concrete. Like ferrock, it can be regarded as carbon-negative, because hemp stores a large amount of atmospheric carbon as it is grown.
Greencrete is an umbrella term for a number of eco-friendly materials meant to mimic the structural properties of concrete. As a construction material, greencrete isn’t widely used yet — but it have been used by construction companies in several experimental construction projects.
In practice, greencrete is typically made from recycled materials, like used plastics and polystyrene.
These materials can be easily found at landfill sites, and have helped to enable quick construction of new structures, like a 40-bed ICU, built to help handle a surge in COVID-19 cases in South Africa.
Finding Sustainable Alternatives to Concrete
For most construction companies, concrete will remain a popular building material — especially for substructure construction. But for every project, there’s often a suitable substitute for concrete that’s comparable in utility and has less of a carbon footprint.
Alternatives made from recycled materials — like ferrock, ashcrete, timbercrete, and hempcrete — tend to require less carbon than concrete and also help to recycle waste materials like steel dust and chaff.
While these materials aren’t always easy to source, in areas where they are readily available, may help a construction company reduce its carbon footprint or provide eco-friendly alternatives to clients.
If these materials become more widely produced — and more widely available as a result — they could provide even greater utility in the future.